#14 Pero sabes de lo que hablas? La conclusión del subcomité es precisamente que la fuga del laboratorio es la opción más plausible. Deja claro que, sin las pruebas que los chinos nunca darán, es imposible confirmarla al 100%, pero la historia del mercado sí queda invalidada por lo siguiente:
1. The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.
2. Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans.
This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.
3. Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels.
4. Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019,
months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.
5. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced
1. The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.
2. Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans.
This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.
3. Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels.
4. Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019,
months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.
5. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced
Aquí tus links: www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&
oversight.house.gov/release/final-report-covid-select-concludes-2-year
www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9